top of page
Search
Writer's pictureJames Dean

Is it Time to Break Up Boeing? Layoffs and the Rise of Autonomous Flight

Boeing, the aviation giant, is facing a turbulent period.  The company recently announced plans to lay off 17,000 employees and take $5 billion in charges, amidst a crippling strike and growing concerns about its future. This comes at a time when the aerospace industry is on the cusp of a major transformation, with autonomous aircraft like commercial drones and eVTOL (electric vertical takeoff and landing) vehicles poised to disrupt the market. For example, autonomous eVTOLs are set to change the way urban dwellers and short-hop business and vacation travelers get around.   


In this context, it's worth asking: is it time for a radical shake-up at Boeing? Could splitting the company into smaller, more focused divisions be the key to unlocking greater innovation, efficiency, and ultimately, higher quality aircraft?


Watch Video Autonomous Passenger Drones ...


The Case for a Boeing Breakup


Boeing's current struggles are multifaceted. The 737 MAX crisis severely damaged the company's reputation and finances.  The COVID-19 pandemic further impacted the aviation industry, leading to decreased demand for new aircraft.  Now, with rising inflation and supply chain issues, Boeing faces additional challenges.   


At the same time, new players are emerging in the aerospace sector, developing innovative autonomous aircraft technologies. These companies are nimble and focused, unburdened by the legacy infrastructure and bureaucracy of a giant like Boeing.


Splitting Boeing into separate companies could offer several advantages:


  • Increased Focus: Smaller companies could concentrate on specific areas of expertise, such as commercial aviation, defense, space, or autonomous flight. This would allow for greater specialization and potentially lead to faster development cycles and improved products.


  • Enhanced Agility: Smaller companies are typically more adaptable to change and can respond more quickly to market demands. This is crucial in a rapidly evolving industry like aerospace.


  • Boosted Innovation: A more competitive environment could foster greater innovation, as each division strives to outperform the others. This could lead to breakthroughs in areas like fuel efficiency, safety, and autonomous flight technology.


  • Improved Productivity: Streamlined operations and reduced bureaucracy could lead to greater efficiency in manufacturing, potentially lowering costs and improving delivery times.


Historical Examples of large aerospace company splits:


  • United Technologies: As mentioned earlier, United Technologies' split into three separate companies in 2020 led to a significant increase in the combined market capitalization.


  • General Electric: GE's recent split is still unfolding, but early indications suggest that it could unlock value for shareholders.


  • Hewlett-Packard: HP's split into HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2015 initially led to a decline in share prices, but both companies have since performed well.


Watch Video GE Aerospace Driving Better Quality and Profits Meeting Industry Demand ...


Challenges and Considerations


While a breakup of Boeing could offer significant benefits, it's not without potential drawbacks.


  • Loss of Synergies: Boeing currently benefits from economies of scale and shared resources across its different divisions. Splitting the company could lead to duplication of efforts and increased costs. Although a split up will drive innovation with fresh ideas, concepts and new leadership to meet ever changing global industry demands.


  • Disruption and Uncertainty: A major restructuring would inevitably cause disruption and uncertainty for employees, customers, and investors. But will drive a new vision that meets and exceeds global industry demands.


  • Reduced Market Power: Smaller companies may have less leverage in negotiations with suppliers and customers. Yet small company footprint becomes more nimble making the business more competitive and focused on productivity and innovation.


Conclusion


The aerospace industry is undergoing a period of rapid transformation. Boeing, facing internal and external challenges, needs to adapt to survive and thrive. Restructuring into smaller, more agile companies could unlock significant value for investors and unleash a wave of innovation. This shift would foster a more competitive, entrepreneurial culture, leading to greater efficiency and long-term returns. By embracing this change, Boeing can position itself for success in the autonomous age of flight.


About Author


James E Dean - Director, ABV ... We're all about creating A Safe Place to Learn, Share Ideas and Discovery in our Connected World. James loves to read, engage in learning, discuss ideas and research new solutions. Mr. Dean brings over 35 years of experience across a wide range of industries worldwide. He is considered by many to be a leading expert in the energy sector, retail eCommerce, brand marketing and AI technology. Currently, he is working on several big projects involving Digital Content Networks and Tokenized Asset eCommerce Programming. J Dean is a frequent Blogger, and graduate of Boston University. He enjoys collecting antiques and memorbilla, studying history, travel adventures and fitness. Inquiry: Message Contact Form

Comments


bottom of page